Blog

More Swiss Bank Accounts Exposed

It has been known for some time that Credit Suisse was the latest target in the crosshairs of the IRS and Department of Justice for hiding money on behalf of U.S. taxpayers.  Today’s Wall Street Journal article, Credit Suisse to Hand Over Account Data,...

Study Shows Corporate Tax Dodging Is Common

The IRS needs whistleblowers now more than ever.  A recently released study by the Citizens for Tax Justice and the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy examined 280 of the current Fortune 500 and found a general pattern of decreasing tax rates,...

Another look at Cooper v. Commissioner.

I wanted to highlight an article published in the September 19, 2011, issue of Tax Notes, "Scratching Our Heads Over Cooper v. Commissioner" by Michelle M. Kwon.  In this article, Ms. Kwon gives a thoughtful discussion of the Tax Court’s jurisdiction to...

IRS Holds Public Hearing on Proposed Regulations on Whistleblower Awards

Last week, Ferraro Law Firm partner, Scott Knott, spoke at the IRS’s public hearing on Proposed Treasury Regulations on the definition of “collected proceeds” in the context of paying whistleblower awards under section 7623.

Scott joined other practitioners in pointing out that the Proposed Regs are too narrow in scope and may prevent the IRS for paying awards that are otherwise authorized under the statute. As Scott noted, the current language “unduly ties the hands of the IRS Whistleblower Office.”

The tax press picked up on Scott’s message that the current language of the Reg unreasonably limits the scope of the statute and may unjustifiably shackle the IRS when it comes time to pay awards. Jeremiah Coder of Tax Notes Today, TNT 2011-10213 [PDF], highlighted Scott’s point that problems with the current wording are a “breadth issue.” Mr. Coder’s article reported that the other practitioners’ testimony echoed Scott’s message: the IRS needs to adopt a broader definition of “collected proceeds.” Similarly, CCH, CCH Federal Tax Day (May 11, 2011) [PDF], relayed Scott and the other practitioners’ message that the IRS needs to expand the scope of the definition of “collected proceeds.” The CCH article noted that whistleblower-favorable language will encourage more whistleblowers to come forward with information about tax evasion.

Are Criminal Fines Part of “Collected Proceeds”?

PMTA 2010-60, Criminal Fines and Whistleblower Awards [PDF], is a line in the sand signaling that the IRS is willing to litigate whether criminal fines are properly included in “collected proceeds.”  The Proposed Treasury Regulations [PDF] are...

Why is the IRS Withholding on Whistleblower Award Payments?

We informed the Whistleblower Office three years ago that we did not believe that the IRS was either required to or had the legal authority to withhold on award payments to whistleblowers under section 7623.  With the payment earlier this month of the first...

Lynam Knott